OSPF Routing and SDN Performance Analysis on Large Scale Networks

Abstract

This study describes the implementation of OSPF and SDN routing protocols on large-scale networks by simulating using Mininet software. As well as trying to analyze which type of routing protocol has better performance by comparing the results of the QoS (Quality of Service) parameters, namely throughput, delay, jitter and packet loss. In this study, tests were carried out using 20 nodes and 20 hosts with the same network load on each routing protocol. Testing is done by getting the conclusion of the throughput parameter where OSPF routing protocol is better than SDN, as well as the delay and jitter parameters. For packet loss parameters, SDN routing protocol is better than OSPF parameters. As well as trying to analyze which type of routing protocol has better performance by comparing the results of the QoS (Quality of Service) parameters, namely throughput, delay, jitter and packet loss. In this study, tests were carried out using 20 nodes and 20 hosts with the same network load on each routing protocol. Testing is done by getting the conclusion of the throughput parameter where OSPF routing protocol is better than SDN, as well as the delay and jitter parameters. For packet loss parameters, SDN routing protocol is better than OSPF parameters. As well as trying to analyze which type of routing protocol has better performance by comparing the results of the QoS (Quality of Service) parameters, namely throughput, delay, jitter and packet loss. In this study, tests were carried out using 20 nodes and 20 hosts with the same network load on each routing protocol. Testing is done by getting the conclusion of the throughput parameter where OSPF routing protocol is better than SDN, as well as the delay and jitter parameters. For packet loss parameters, SDN routing protocol is better than OSPF parameters. In this study, tests were carried out using 20 nodes and 20 hosts with the same network load on each routing protocol. Testing is done by getting the conclusion of the throughput parameter where OSPF routing protocol is better than SDN, as well as the delay and jitter parameters. For packet loss parameters, SDN routing protocol is better than OSPF parameters. In this study, tests were carried out using 20 nodes and 20 hosts with the same network load on each routing protocol. Testing is done by getting the conclusion of the throughput parameter where OSPF routing protocol is better than SDN, as well as the delay and jitter parameters. For packet loss parameters, SDN routing protocol is better than OSPF parameters.